My Photo

May 12, 2008

And They Call This 'Not Working'

So today, in honor of the fact that yesterday was Mother's Day, I thought I would give a quick rundown of an Average Day around here, and how I spend my time. (Because, frankly, I don't even know myself most of the time.)

Today: Up at 6 to have a little bit of quiet time with the newspaper and drink coffee to wake up my brain. At 7, dragged the seven-year-old out of bed, coaxed her downstairs, made her breakfast. Said goodbye to the husband, who's going on the road for three days. Coaxed the seven-year old into her clothes. Coaxed her into actually eating her breakfast; brushed her hair; screamed "I'M LEAVING NOW" in an attempt to convince her that it really was 8 a.m. and TIME TO GO...and drove her to school. Back home, in time to unload the dishwasher and clean up the kitchen and make a vet appointment for the cat, who has managed to get into another catfight and who is clearly got some infected bite somewhere. Helped the 11 year old blow-dry her hair. Did the second school schlep of the morning, which involved taking her and picking up her friend Briane, and dropping them off at school.

Home at 9:30. Into the office, where I worked for two hours on writer-y stuff. Then looked at clock, realized the house was still a wreck, and I had to get the cat to the vet by 12:20. Went into white tornado mode--picking up dirty clothes, making beds, tidying up. Dashed into the shower. Removed one load from the dryer, folded it, put another load in. Discovered I had no time to do my own hair. Threw a scarf on my head, threw the cat in the cat carrier, and hit the road. From noon until 2:30, I was at the vet's, at Verizon getting my cellphone fixed, and at the hardware store, where I bought spackle and the wooden stakes for the compost pile I'm going to create as soon as I get the time. Stopped at Wendy's to grab the least caloric thing I could find, then back to school to pick up the seven-year-old and her friend Lily, who is coming over for a playdate. Back at home. Check e-mail. Did one more load of laundry, checked phone messages, got a drill and fixed the broken curtain rod holder in the seven-year-old's bedroom. Swept out garage. Made a chicken pot pie for dinner out of the chicken that was thawed and is going to go bad if I don't use it. Helped seven-year-old with homework. Handed off Lily to her mom. Served dinner. In a spare moment, used the spackle I bought at the hardware store to plug the nail holes in the stairwell wall, which I have been meaning to do since we moved into this house six weeks ago. (Tomorrow, if I'm lucky, I'll find the touch up paint.)

Now it's almost 7 p.m. and I have reading to do for work, plus the 11 year old's homework to check up on, plus there's that last load of laundry to fold, plus a few random things that need to be ironed. Not to mention the nightly bedtime hassle, and an e-mail I need to send to the seven-year-old's teacher. And there's out of town houseguests coming this weekend, and last night the toilet next to the guest room overflowed. And I realized I have no towels down there that are not in rags, so there's a trip to Target in my immediate future.

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what millions of unpaid caregivers do in America every day--the privileged ones, that is, who are not actually bound by economic necessity to punch a time clock five days a week. Many tens of millions more unpaid caregivers do all this, more or less, and punch a time clock. For those in the salaried work force, it's called "juggling"--as if all this were some kind of fun circus ball to play with. For those of us who do it full time, it's called "not working"--and someday our Social Security checks will record this period of our lives as "out of the labor force." None of the work we do will be counted as part of the Gross Domestic Product--even though it would certainly count as labor if somebody else, say a child-care provider, were doing it. Nor will this work qualify us for any kind of tax credit. It's just--poof!--not there. Nonexistent, in the eyes of the government and Wall Street and the whole academic army of economists out there.

If it strikes you that this maybe is not really fair, check out this website, and also this one, and do a little reading. And then maybe write a letter or two or three. And happy belated Mother's Day to us all.


April 18, 2008

Empathy, Schmpathy

So I'm driving Suzanne to school this morning and my mood is not happy. I've had a fight with my sister (via e-mail, of course) and now, in the aftermath, I'm doing what people tend to do when it comes to internecine family warfare--i.e., imaging the conversation going differently, coming up with some devastating, lay-'er-flat line, wishing that just for ONCE we could communicate, just generally feeling aggrieved and hurt. My bad vibes are filling up the car. From the back seat, Suzanne says, "Mommy, did I do anything to make you sad?"

"No," I reply bitterly. "I have somebody else taking care of that for me, thanks."

A short silence.

"Mom, did you say that to be funny?"

"No, not really."

"Because it was."

April 15, 2008

Bribery 101

So we are officially Moved, as in all the boxes are unpacked and we are now back into the Random Stuff Accumulation Mode that passes for normal life, and one of the things we have accumulated around here is new friends for the kids. Suzanne (7) has adopted, or been adopted by, a posse of little boys who live in or near our cul de sac, and they now spend their afternoons whizzing around on their bikes so fast I can't keep track of them.

Which is no doubt why last week she and two of the little boys were upstairs in Rebecca's bedroom without permission. As I later reconstructed the crime scene, Suzanne was looking for something behind Rebecca's bed and as she was squeezing in between the bed and the wall she accidentally yanked the curtains down with her, in the process pulling the curtain rod off the wall. Thinking fast, she then spotted the little net bag where Rebecca had been stashing her allowance and pilfered it for $1 to pay off the witnesses. Because, really, when you're going to bribe somebody, why use your own money? It's just so wasteful.

And here's how kids are different. Rebecca (11) was OUTRAGED and SHOCKED that Suzanne had gone into her room WITHOUT PERMISSION, which, even had she asked, Rebecca wouldn't have granted in a MILLION YEARS, because little sisters are so ANNOYING. The fact that her little sister was using her allowance for hush money--that aspect of the crime blew right past her. Whereas for Suzanne, the idea and the execution took about two nanoseconds. Which just goes to show: great criminal minds are born, not made.





April 10, 2008

Wouldn't Have Known Nice If It Bit Her In The Ass

He was five years younger, and very good-looking. I mentally crossed him off the list then and there.

"Too young for me," I said to myself. "Too good looking. He's going to want some beach babe, not me."

I did my best to put him off. I told myself not to get my hopes up (but I bought a new outfit anyway). He mentioned his elementary school; I mentioned going to parent-teacher conferences there (with the son of my previous boyfriend, who was eight years older than I). He asked if I wanted to see a movie, and I said yes (but I picked a grim one, thinking Bet he'll be bored.) He wasn't bored. Neither was I. I kept waiting for the ax to fall, the fatal flaw to reveal itself. Nothing happened. We went on a couple more dates. What is wrong with this guy? I kept thinking. There must be something wrong.

After the third or fourth date--I forget--we wound up back at my place, and he put some moves on me, and I sat him down on the sofa and gave him The Talk. I told him about my delicate emotional life, and what a poor fragile thing I was, and what a disaster the last boyfriend had been, and how I had decided, very firmly, not to Get Involved just now. I was dating around, I said. No exclusive relationships. He would just have to understand, I said.

He sat there for a long moment, looking at his clasped hands. Then he looked at me and said, "That's okay. I can wait. I'm a nice guy. If you stick around, sooner or later you'll figure that out."

This is a cliche, but really and truly, time stopped for a moment. It was like the universe hit me upside the head with a two-by-four and said, HEY. MUSH-FOR-BRAINS! PAY ATTENTION!

Even then I wasn't sure. I decided to run it by some people. Two night later, I'm having drinks with my friend Alison, and I recount this whole incident. "Well, that's worth checking out," she said. Alison, my level-headed friend, so good at keeping her wits when all about are losing theirs. I had zero faith in my own judgment, but Alison's I trusted. Okay, I thought. I'll give it a try.

Fast forward 15 years, to last night. I've been out late, and I come in the house, tiptoeing, and on the kitchen table I see a card that says, "For Tracy. With all my love. #14." It's from the nice guy, who is asleep upstairs, who has put the kids to bed so I can enjoy a night out with friends on what was our wedding anniversary night, except the babysitter bailed at the last minute. And I reflect on how, sometimes, when the universe wants to give you something priceless, it has to pry open your white-knuckled, clenched little fist and press it into your unwilling hand. Words cannot express how glad I am that happened to me, so all I can say is: Happy Anniversary, love.

April 03, 2008

Where Have All the Grown-Ups Gone?

George Carlin says public education isn't in the business of training engaged citizens; it's in the business of training obedient workers. He's 90 percent correct, but what else is new? Education has always had its caste system; Yale students "go to school to learn to rule," but they are a carefully selected elite, and that's not a slogan you'll hear at, oh, East Tennessee State. What's more, public schools deal with a huge array of social problems, and they're easy to pick on.

Increasingly, though, I see things at the public schools that make me think all the grownups with common sense have been replaced by Pod People--and at the same time, I keep seeing things that make me think the Pod People are dealing with kids who don't have grownups for parents.

This morning, there was a Washington Post story about a six-year-old boy who got reported to the police for sexual harassment because a smacked a little girl on the bottom at recess. Since when has a six-year-old been capable of sexual harassment? Since when does smacking another child on the bottom make a kid the Spawn of Satan? But according to the story, the school officials were just following orders. Or what they said they thought were orders.

"Days before the incident, at a routine meeting with district officials, principals had been reminded to report threats and assaults to the police," the story said. "'There was some confusion as to what level of threat and assault we were talking about,' said Ken Blackstone, a school system spokesman."

Yeah, I'd say so. Lots of confusion; no common sense. But let's give school officials a break here; they may have realized that calling the cops was over-reacting, but feared that if they did anything less, the little girl's parents would sue. Stranger things have happened. Which explains, maybe, why when my own six-year-old was discovered trying to tie up another kid with a jump rope (both of them had come up with the idea, and they'd been practicing on each other), the school all but called out the SWAT team. Both kids got hauled into the vice-principal's office, both got a long lecture, both sets of parents were called in the middle of the day, and my daughter was barred from using a jump-rope for the next month, even to jump rope with. Obviously, my daughter and her accomplice deserved a reprimand--never a good idea to tie people up, certain very adult situations possibly excepted--but holy cow. I'm sure, though, that the school was Following Procedures. I dared not offer so much as a comment, for fear that the school would take the next step and ban jump ropes altogether.

I don't know; maybe they need an inch-thick manual of procedures for such everyday occurrences, since weird things seem to be happening at home. I let my kids watch TV, if for no other reason than to keep track of the messages they're getting. From time to time, I ban certain shows. I'm getting ready to issue a ban on "Fairly Odd Parents" on the basis that yeah, well, Timmy is an average who no one understands--but Mom and Dad are complete idiots and his "real" parents--the fairy godparents, who live in a goldfish bowl--are Complete Enablers, existing only to grant Timmy's every wish. My kids already have a raging sense of entitlement, which I have to beat into submission on a regular basis, and they display a disturbing tendency to roll their eyes when my husband or I make some observation. You expect that at 15; at 11 and 7, we are considerably ahead of schedule--and feeding them more of this crap is the last thing we need.

"Fairly Odd Parents," however, is "Teletubbies" compared to what some of her classmates seem to be watching. Last week, my first grader told me that she'd heard a boy in her class talking about "peeing in somebody's mouth." This was in the car; I nearly drove the minivan into a ditch. Further questioning revealed that a) the kid involved had not asked her to participate in this activity, and b) it was likely he didn't even know what this activity was all about. Still, you have to wonder: how late do this kid's parents let him stay up? And what channels is he watching? And, more ominously, once he catches on, is he going to think that this looks like something fun to try at recess?

And if he does, will the teachers be so busy dealing with a jump rope Incident that they'll miss it?

We're in a vicious cycle: parents are too overworked or complacent or distracted to keep a lid on things at home, so the schools try to take up the slack by issuing another set of lawyer-vetted rules and guidelines. The result is a great big honkin' manual that teachers and school administrators regard as Holy Writ and which they follow to the letter even when the results are ridiculous. It's as if parents and schools are a dysfunctional set of parents: one's unwilling to impose consistent limits, so the other reacts by becoming a  major nag and pain in the ass, which the first parent reacts to by undermining the other parent's authority, which the other parent reacts to by ramping up enforcement of all the rules, including the dumb ones.

If it sounds like I know this subject too well--well, I do. My husband and I have traversed this path. I tended to be the conflict-avoidant Good Cop; he reacted by taking on the role of the Bad Cop. The results weren't pretty. Over the years we've both worked a lot on this, which for me has meant finding a backbone and which for him has meant taking a lot of deep breaths and repeating the mantra, "They're only kids. They're only kids." It's a tough problem to address, but it can be done. For schools, it means re-introducing the concept of "common sense" to some situations, like ones involving six-year-old boys who smack little girls on the bottom because they were teasing her. For parents, this means more, not less, involvement in kids' lives the older they get. This is contrary to conventional wisdom, I know, but the older my kids get the more I find I need to keep hanging out in their vicinity to get an idea of what's going on with them: who they're having a fight with, what kind of clothes they think are fashionable, what kind of friends they have, how well they're handling disputes and deadlines and crises. It also means being willing to speak up when schools start pushing kids around for being kids, or imposing ridiculous penalties for violating Procedure 34B, subparagraph 14. Of course, any challenge to school authority these days is a perilous undertaking, but that's a whole other rant. In short, it means that all us Baby Boomers--teachers and parents--are going to have to start finding our Inner Grownup, which is not something we seem inclined to do (still another rant). But still: it's gotta be done.

Anyway, I have to go. I need to look up the manual on my television remote so I can figure out how to program the stupid V chip. "Fairly Odd Parents" comes on at 3.

March 21, 2008

A Word to My Critic(s)

Wow. I had no idea of the breadth of my readership, obviously, until "Grace" weighed in. (See comments on previous post.) And what I'm about to do is wrong, so wrong, because taking on people like "Grace" is like beating up on a cripple--but anyways, "Grace," I will address your "points," as the judges say, seriatim:

1. "I'm just wondering how happy you will be in say 10 years when your little daughter or grand daughter are dating or even marrying one of your neighbor's sons?" I don't know how I'll feel, "Grace." It depends on what this hypothetical prospective son-in-law is like. I imagine I'll ask the usual questions: Is he kind to my daughter? Does he love her? Is he employed? Does he have baggage (vengeful ex, 3 kids from a previous marriage etc.)? But since you and I obviously won't live in the same neighborhood, "Grace," given your take on things, I'm pretty sure he won't be your son. Which, frankly, is a point in his favor, sight unseen.

2. "You can say whatever you want but there is a REASON why this country is racially divided. It's called HISTORY!" .....Class, this is a perfect example of the logical fallacy known as "begging the question," frequently referred to as "circular reasoning." In it, the person derives a "conclusion" from a premise that looks remarkably like the conclusion--and which, in fact, is just a restatement of the conclusion. Thus: "There's a reason...." and "It's called HISTORY" say the same thing, but to the careless reader it might seem as if there is some brain action going on here. Not so. No brain action to see here, folks. Move along.

3. "A person, or a group's past is a fantastic indicator of what their future looks like." Okay, turn off "Dr. Phil" right now, and back away from the TV slowly. Yes, I know Dr. Phil says "the best indicator of future behavior is past behavior," and Dr. Phil has a teensy little point there. But, interestingly, it's not the point I was writing about. I was writing about this thing called "evolution," also known as "change."  But I sense I've lost you here, "Grace," so I'll boil it down for ya: You may be the same dumb shit you were in 1964, but not all of us are.

4. "Drive down Martin Luther King Blvd. in any city, in any state and tell me what you see! I'll tell you... you will see drug addicts, gang members, losers who mooch off the govt. and refuse to get up and WORK for a living, violence, and worse than all of the above... you will see a group of hateful, angry, human beings!" Really. Is this true? DRUGS and VIOLENCE in the inner city? People on WELFARE? Why wasn't I told?? But seriously, "Grace," what you say is true, but it's not all of the truth. Because I've been on streets like that (more than you have, I dare say) and I've met plenty of other kinds of people, too. Pity you can see only people who look like you. What? You don't see the resemblance? You were distracted by the skin tone, probably.

5. "Facts are Facts and I don't want that in my neighborhood, feeling up my daughter, like a disease, infecting my grandchildren.... You may want to re-think your thougths." This is unintentionally funny, "Grace"--I suspect facts will never get anywhere near your neighborhood, much less in your brain--but what I think you meant to say is that people of a different race (because, really, your way of thinking is hardly confined to African Americans, I'm sure) are "like a disease." A lecherous disease, too, because they'd be feeling up your daughter, etc. And that's where this stops being funny, and I'm not making any more jokes. In fact I'm blocking you from my site, "Grace," because I think I know all I ever want to know about your take on things. See ya.

March 19, 2008

Living in a Post-Racial World

This speech that Barack Obama gave yesterday on the subject of race--I tell you, it does my soul good. If that puts me in the tank for Obama, so be it; if this guy is spouting a line, then I've fallen for it. But I believe him. I think he sees something that's really there, and that nobody else has seen quite as clearly as he has: "This nation is more than the sum of its parts - that out of many, we are truly one." And that, despite the deep imperfections we all embody, that "what we know -- what we have seen - is that America can change.  That is the true genius of this nation."

I believe this is true, in part, because of how much I have changed, and because of how much the world I live in has changed in the half-century I've been on this planet.

I grew up just south of Atlanta, next door to my grandfather's farm. Visible from the living room of our house was the tarpaper shack that my grandparents rented out to their tenant farmers, a black family named Strozier. I am not exaggerating for literary effect: this was a shack, and it was made of tarpaper, though the inside walls were insulated, if you can call it that, with layers of newsprint. It was four rooms and a porch, built up off the ground in the time-honored country way, and it did not have indoor plumbing. I grew up thinking that this was the way black people lived. I knew white people who were poor, too--we certainly weren't rich ourselves--but I just assumed that to be really poor, you had to be black, and vice versa. This was just a law of the universe, like gravity. And this immutable fact--that whites and blacks coexisted on friendly terms but were in no way equal--was reflected in the doors of the two waiting rooms of the dentist we went to in Fairburn, too. There were no signs on those doors, but the signs had been there so long that you could still see their imprint against the wood. One door said "white" and the other door said "colored." This did not seem at all strange to me. But life teaches you lessons, if you let it.

First lesson: In 1964, when I was seven, I was walking home from school one day with my friend Mike Polston. My daddy was a Goldwater conservative (this was the historic year Georgia went Republican for the first time since Reconstruction). and I was incensed to learn that Mike's daddy planned on voting for Johnson. "If you vote for Johnson, you'll have to go to school with niggers," I said. One of the realities of childhood is that you wind up repeating things you've heard without knowing what they mean, and that's what I had done. Nobody in my home used the word "nigger"--not because it was racist, but because it was uncouth; my parents taught me that the correct term was "colored"--so I don't know where I'd heard this line, but I said it, and the instant I said it I realized that Lovett and Roberta were walking home right behind us. And that was the other idiocy: the possibility I was taunting my playmate with was already a reality in our school (though not because of anybody's progressive policies; there simply had never been enough black children in our district to have ever justified a separate school system, or else I'm sure there would have been one). I've never forgotten the searing shame I felt. Lovett and Roberta never said a thing, never gave any indication they'd heard me. That's the way things worked back then, too.

Second lesson: In 1981, I was a rookie reporter for the Atlanta Constitution, sent to cover an inquest in Walton County, Georgia into the death of Lynn McKinley Jackson, a young black man found hanging from a tree in the woods there. Walton County happens to be the scene of the last recorded public lynching in the United States, in 1947. That's not a widely known fact, but it's encoded in the DNA of every black person who has lived in that county ever since. Many of those black residents crowded into the courtroom that day to hear the jury's verdict on this young man's death, and I still remember the collective gasp from that crowd when the jury returned the verdict: suicide. That instant brought home to me that there were two definitions of "history" and two definitions of "justice" in the United States. There was the conventional wisdom, and then there was the version that black people knew. Sometimes they overlapped, but often they didn't, and where a gulf existed between the two, it was huge. So was the amount of energy it took all of us, all day every day, to pretend--at least most of the time--that the gulf did not exist.

Third lesson: right now. We just moved into a new subdivision. It's only two miles from our old house and in the same county--but on our old street, the neighbors were all white except for two families at the end of the street, who were black. I had not realized until after we moved into our new house that now the situation was reversed: we are the only white family in our cul de sac. I would be lying if I did not admit that this fact has given me pause. It made me uneasy, in a way I could not define, and at the same time I felt ashamed of my uneasiness. The correct liberal view would be to say, "Don't be silly! White or black--makes no difference. Black people are just like you." But no one who has grown up where I grew up, and has had the experiences I've had, would believe this. We are not the same; our histories are profoundly different, and to pretend otherwise is insulting. How different? Let's take money. My husband and I bought this house with a substantial down payment made possible by money left to me by my mother--the results of some investments my father made back in the 1960s and 70s, which were possible for him to make because he surfed the wave of the unprecedented  prosperity that followed World War II in this country. Part of his money came from real estate, which ballooned in valued over this period. During that same period, there were real estate covenants in force in Prince George's County, Maryland, where I now live, which severely curtailed the home-buying options for black families. They were cut out of much of the real estate boom, just like they were cut out of many of the career opportunities open to my father. (The economic research division at Delta Air Lines, where my father worked, did not hire its first black employee until the mid 1970s.) This is not to say that the teachers, police officers and nurses who live in our cul de sac didn't benefit from inheritances, too. For all I know, they did. But statistically speaking, that's not as likely for them as it is for me. The mortgages they got likelier came with higher interest rates than the one we found. And while we can afford (for now, anyway) for me to work part-time, every other family in our cul de sac is a two-wage-earner family. "You work at home?" one of my new neighbors said to me when she learned I was a writer. Her eyes got misty. "You are so blessed." Yes. Yes, I am. And, in historical terms, race has something to do with that. Or, as Barack Obama put it in his speech yesterday:

"Legalized discrimination - where blacks were prevented, often through violence, from owning property, or loans were not granted to African-American business owners, or black homeowners could not access FHA mortgages, or blacks were excluded from unions, or the police force, or fire departments - meant that black families could not amass any meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations."

I also know that Obama's words are themselves are a generalization; in my life, I've crossed paths with black people who had plenty of inherited wealth. I can count them on one hand, but yes, they exist--and I have no doubt that their grandparents probably looked down their noses at my grandparents, redneck toilers that my grandparents were. But the exception, as the saying goes, proves the rule.

Obama's speech happened to come two weeks after our big move, and just on the heels of my own realization that, you know, I'm over this stupid uneasiness; I like it here. Our neighbors seem to be nice folks. We may become good friends, we may end up hating each other, we may just remain polite acquaintances, but I'm pretty sure at this point that whatever happens in the next few years, race won't have much to do with it. Basically, they seem to want exactly what we want: a quiet neighborhood where property values are maintained and where kids can play outside safely with other kids in the neighborhood.

Getting over the racial stalemate in this country--acknowledging that great big gulf I discovered years ago, and finding ways to go over, around or through it--"requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper," Obama said in his speech yesterday. I do not hold myself up as any paragon of enlightenment when I say I think I've gotten to that point. I'm just saying: this is where I've come from, and this is where I am. And I do not think I am alone.


March 16, 2008

The Messy Building of Something Enduring. Or the Enduring Building of Something Messy. It Depends.

We watched the first two parts of the HBO series "John Adams" tonight and I thought it was pretty good. But aside from my critical evaluation of TV shows, which isn't worth much, I was also thinking about the nature of history and how messy it is when it's made--how little the people involved know at the time about what they're doing, really, or how it will all turn out. And then I looked up at this big new house we're in, and at the bedrooms doors of the two little girls who were sleeping upstairs, and I thought about how none of the present moment could have been foreseen by me or by David when we went out on that first date. And yet here we are 14 years later, a family. It's a messy process which never seems to end, this creation of a family, and you don't know how it will all turn out.

But somehow it seems worth doing.

March 10, 2008

It's Amazing to Me I Once Worked There

I wasn't going to say anything about this inane piece in the Washington Post by Charlotte Allen about the teeny-bopper kinda love the ladies have to Barack Obama ("We Scream, We Swoon. How Dumb Can We Get?")--I mean, it was so stupid it passed out of my head about as fast as my daily horoscope--but then I see where John Pomfret, the Outlook editor who commissioned it, was quoted as saying the piece was tongue-in-cheek.

To which I can only reply: No, John, it wasn't tongue-in-cheek. It was head-up-ass.

I swear, weeks like this I find myself thinking newspapers can't die fast enough. It's not like people can't be sublimely stupid on the Internet, but at least they don't kill trees doing it.

February 26, 2008

Only in First Grade is a Rash a Social Asset

Bad weekend around here: my 7-yea-old, Suzanne, was walking around with a hollow cough that made her sound like Tallulah Bankhead after a weekend bender, so it was off to the doctor and then to the drugstore for a round of antibiotics. On Friday night (these things always happen on weekends) she sprouted a weird, vividly red rash on her butt. Thinking she is having an allergic reaction to the amoxycillin, I call the on-call physician, who says yeah, that's probably what it is, and prescribes a new antibiotic.....which we forgot to get on Saturday, since by then she was already feeling better.

Then, on Sunday, the rash spreads, she develops a wicked earache and my husband and I look at each other and go, Hey, why didn't you go pick up that prescription?? Because, of course, the only way to deal with something like this is to immediately blame your spouse. Anyway, back to the store, new antibiotic, but the rash persists. So yesterday, once again, we are hauling up the road to the pediatrician. This time, the doctor looks at Suzanne's butt and says, "Well, her ear is already better and I can't hear anything in her chest."

"So what about the rash?" I say.

"Don't know what it is," the doctor says. "But it's getting better, so don't worry about it. Sometimes we never figure these things out." And she ruled out lethal staph infections and ringworm and bedbugs.

Back in the car, headed this time to school, Suzanne sighs happily. "I can't wait to get to class!" she says. "When I tell everybody all about my rash I am going to be soooo popular!"